Apparently the O'Hare ufo photo that people kept sending me yesterday and that I posted then originated from the above top secret forum. It still seems to be most likely a hoax or perhaps some sort of disinformation. I suppose it could be real, but so far I really doubt that. Not just because it is nearly 3 months after the event, but also I find it hard to trust anonymous people. If you were going to stay anonymous anyway, why not have posted it 2 months ago? Why wait this long?
In most ways I find hoaxers far more irritating than debunkers. Often I wonder if they aren't the same people because a hoax always benefits the debunkies. They always use the small part of an event that was hoaxed or lied about in a effort to prove the whole story to be false. Many times that seems to work on a lot of people.
Take Bob Lazar as an example, it is clear to most, including myself that he was not completely truthful in giving his education and background. However, unlike many I think there is still something to his story. He did know exactly when those ufos would be flying, he somehow knew that. I don't think it was a lucky guess and I would guess there is more to the story than we may ever know. Still, others totally dismiss him as a fraud, never wondering how he came about that information. I personally think that Lazar may have been set up. He may have actually been given a job at Area 51, which he may not have been qualified for, with the full knowledge or at least hope, due to some sort of profiling, that he would leak information. Why you ask? Because if it was somehow thought that we (the USA) are the ones with the ufos, less people might think they were from somewhere else. There is now a rather large group of people who think all ufos are US secret projects and mostly because of the Area 51 sightings. It makes sense in a way, Area 51 is a place where secret US aircraft have been developed in the past, so if ufos are flying out of there then all ufos must be ours.
I am not saying the O'Hare sighting was a set up. I went off on another path there, rather than following my actual point, which was if you can prove part of a story is a lie, less people will believe any of the story.
OK, this is getting far longer than I had meant so I will sign off now.
No comments:
Post a Comment