Once again, the "wild man" emerges from yet another part of the world. How can bigfoot be a hoax when nearly every country has their own local variety? It baffles me that of the thousands of primatologists in the world, literally only a handful will even consider taking the bigfoot phenomenon seriously. The existence of such a creature would shake the foundations of human anthropological history. Then again, perhaps that's why academics are silent on the issue.
2 comments:
Once again, the "wild man" emerges from yet another part of the world. How can bigfoot be a hoax when nearly every country has their own local variety? It baffles me that of the thousands of primatologists in the world, literally only a handful will even consider taking the bigfoot phenomenon seriously. The existence of such a creature would shake the foundations of human anthropological history. Then again, perhaps that's why academics are silent on the issue.
- Jarret
It isn't really surprising, academics of all kinds are not really open to things that aren't in text books.
Post a Comment