No -- you're still an infant, in the spring of an autumn.
You know, if _any_ of your readers we're maligned by this scabrously scofulous scut (Rich Reynolds) as one who would have sex with a child... like I was, I would point out justification for excluding him from our literary company, at all.
His sociopathy could not be more plain. Why suffer his thoughtless contributions and risk his turning an evil lens upon anyone else?
There are some who would protest that I make too much of this, that I beat a drum already in tatters or shreds. Really?
Put yourself in my shoes. Already excluded from a teaching career for "directing children to inappropriate [unspecified] web-sites [my own, iaw syllabus] I'm further libeled as a kiddiporn enthusiast by a person willfully damaging and continuing to damage me, continuing to intimate my guilt, because I won't step off about it and demand damages (donated to that which RR finds so loathsome ufologically)... _and_ a sincere apology.
I'm smeared like this one more time and even the most forgiving among us will wonder why this stuff keeps coming up about Lehmberg.
Smoke And Fire...
I'm a little disappointed I'm allowed to swing on this when I would not tolerate this happening to any one of you. Some lines just cannot be crossed.
For my part: and this is no ultimatum, mind you, just a statement of intention: I will not contribute where RR is welcome as a contributor in any way.
Cutting off my nose to spite my face? Sir and Madam! Is that all my satisfaction would cost... a nose?
Then I go nose-less gladly.
Damages? Seven figures!
Apology? Long, detailed, effusive, unconditional, and public.
1 comment:
Comment on the Kimball site commentary:
No -- you're still an infant, in the spring of an autumn.
You know, if _any_ of your readers we're maligned by this scabrously scofulous scut (Rich Reynolds) as one who would have sex with a child... like I was, I would point out justification for excluding him from our literary company, at all.
His sociopathy could not be more plain. Why suffer his thoughtless contributions and risk his turning an evil lens upon anyone else?
There are some who would protest that I make too much of this, that I beat a drum already in tatters or shreds. Really?
Put yourself in my shoes. Already excluded from a teaching career for "directing children to inappropriate [unspecified] web-sites [my own, iaw syllabus] I'm further libeled as a kiddiporn enthusiast by a person willfully damaging and continuing to damage me, continuing to intimate my guilt, because I won't step off about it and demand damages (donated to that which RR finds so loathsome ufologically)... _and_ a sincere apology.
I'm smeared like this one more time and even the most forgiving among us will wonder why this stuff keeps coming up about Lehmberg.
Smoke And Fire...
I'm a little disappointed I'm allowed to swing on this when I would not tolerate this happening to any one of you. Some lines just cannot be crossed.
For my part: and this is no ultimatum, mind you, just a statement of intention: I will not contribute where RR is welcome as a contributor in any way.
Cutting off my nose to spite my face? Sir and Madam! Is that all my satisfaction would cost... a nose?
Then I go nose-less gladly.
Damages? Seven figures!
Apology? Long, detailed, effusive, unconditional, and public.
Post a Comment