All apologies to Dr. Randle, but I fail to see the profit, intellectual or otherwise, in facilitating the inane, disingenuous, inconsistent, entirely facile, and wholly anthropomorphic mewlings of Rich Reynolds, to _any_ degree.
It may be that I have an Axe to grind in regard of his fatuousness and unrepentant sociopathy...
...but I surmise if I pulled a fraction of the crap he pulls on a regular basis I'd be ridden out of of U-town on a rail dripping hot tar and retching dirty feathers!
Truly, Reynolds and his stupid simulacrum should be avoided, I submit, for the toxic non progressive program he giddily prosecutes.
Again, my apologies to Dr. "K" for voicing this considered opinion on his nickle, but the discussion is in no way facilitated by a murder of vomiting crows, much less the likes of RR and his panoply of tendentious troll sites, eh?
Hey... it makes it to K. Randle's site it may be news... only, why would anyone continue to credit Reynolds as having anything remotely constructive to say except that which more stridently propounds his self-serving pathology... in my humble opinion of course. It's clear that at the drop of an imagined hat he'll smear you with the most egregious slanders... that's a fact. Maybe that's why people tolerate him, eh? Fear of his slander precludes his well earned dismissal?
Since I dont have a horse in the race, I suppose that I see the situation differently in that provocation has it's uses in the largely still born stasis Ufology or whatever this is finds itself stalled within. If we only tolerate the congratulatory or the positive in this situation it's sort of a form of prejudicial, self comforting exercise of censorship. Maybe we need our corns stepped on to see if the patient is still alive. The problem is mixing personalities with what they are saying however is the stuff of rant versus rant, which is both boring and beside the point. A challenge was issued..and responded to. And so it goes... I have been called every name under the sun, told my blog is a piece of crap, etc...so what does that have to do with the price of a loaf of bread?
Maybe it's not the corns being trod but who's doing the treading and what motivates the treader.
That, and that you'd feel a little less egalitarian, perhaps, if he who trods had provided the suggestion that _you_ had sex with children, eh? Taken together, I'm so motivated to put my literary fist through his throat at every opportunity.
See, I figure I owe it to the next person he tries his shit on, follow?
There could be criticism with regard to tediousness and appropriatness, but that criticism pales when it's you falsely accused, believe me. Besides, human drama is played out in all walks, at all levels, and in any situation. I won't apologise for it here.
I'm owed apologies and damages for slander per se. With no money to prime the "justice" system-pump I'm relegated to to trying my case in the court of public opinion. I will do so, at every opportunity, until I have my satisfaction.
Would you do less?
alienview@roadrunner.com > www.AlienView.net >> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/ >>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com
5 comments:
All apologies to Dr. Randle, but I fail to see the profit, intellectual or otherwise, in facilitating the inane, disingenuous, inconsistent, entirely facile, and wholly anthropomorphic mewlings of Rich Reynolds, to _any_ degree.
It may be that I have an Axe to grind in regard of his fatuousness and unrepentant sociopathy...
http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/2005/11/smoke-and-fire.html
...but I surmise if I pulled a fraction of the crap he pulls on a regular basis I'd be ridden out of of U-town on a rail dripping hot tar and retching dirty feathers!
Truly, Reynolds and his stupid simulacrum should be avoided, I submit, for the toxic non progressive program he giddily prosecutes.
Again, my apologies to Dr. "K" for voicing this considered opinion on his nickle, but the discussion is in no way facilitated by a murder of vomiting crows, much less the likes of RR and his panoply of tendentious troll sites, eh?
Is that what it says? I didn't get the time to actually read it yesterday. It is unlikely I would have posted it if I knew that.
Hey... it makes it to K. Randle's site it may be news... only, why would anyone continue to credit Reynolds as having anything remotely constructive to say except that which more stridently propounds his self-serving pathology... in my humble opinion of course. It's clear that at the drop of an imagined hat he'll smear you with the most egregious slanders... that's a fact. Maybe that's why people tolerate him, eh? Fear of his slander precludes his well earned dismissal?
Since I dont have a horse in the race, I suppose that I see the situation differently in that provocation has it's uses in the largely still born stasis Ufology or whatever this is finds itself stalled within. If we only tolerate the congratulatory or the positive in this situation it's sort of a form of prejudicial, self comforting exercise of censorship. Maybe we need our corns stepped on to see if the patient is still alive. The problem is mixing personalities with what they are saying however is the stuff of rant versus rant, which is both boring and beside the point. A challenge was issued..and responded to. And so it goes... I have been called every name under the sun, told my blog is a piece of crap, etc...so what does that have to do with the price of a loaf of bread?
Maybe it's not the corns being trod but who's doing the treading and what motivates the treader.
That, and that you'd feel a little less egalitarian, perhaps, if he who trods had provided the suggestion that _you_ had sex with children, eh? Taken together, I'm so motivated to put my literary fist through his throat at every opportunity.
See, I figure I owe it to the next person he tries his shit on, follow?
There could be criticism with regard to tediousness and appropriatness, but that criticism pales when it's you falsely accused, believe me. Besides, human drama is played out in all walks, at all levels, and in any situation. I won't apologise for it here.
I'm owed apologies and damages for slander per se. With no money to prime the "justice" system-pump I'm relegated to to trying my case in the court of public opinion. I will do so, at every opportunity, until I have my satisfaction.
Would you do less?
alienview@roadrunner.com
> www.AlienView.net
>> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
>>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com
Post a Comment