Thursday, July 29, 2010

Sherif’s nephew claims Travis Walton Hoax well known?

UFO Media Matters: Sherif’s nephew claims Travis Walton Hoax well known?

5 comments:

Alfred Lehmberg said...

For my part? I can't be bothered by flaccid klasskurtxians who won't be interrupted in their turgid, cowardly, and unimaginative debunkery long enough to hit the return key for a freakin' new paragraph, eh?

Thanks for the deconstruction of same Joe.

purrlgurrl said...

It's really hard to take seriously this inarticulate tirade that reads like some good ole boy's drunken rage speak (Hello . . . Mel).

I believe I've read (don't ask me where, I'm entering the losing brain cells part of life) that Walton's first polygraph indicated he was lying and his second was inconclusive.

Since polygraph "evidence" is highly questionable (a sociopath can fool the equipment) I don't think Walton's results mean much one way or the other.

This all boils down to "he said, that he said that he said" hearway, which is usually never correct even if there's some underlying truth and is not admissable in a court proceeding.

purrlgurrl said...

I really am losing brain cells. That's supposed to be hearsay not hearway. Oops.

Deirdre said...

I'm kind of with Alfred on this. Why are some people so afraid of paragraphs?

LesleyinNM said...

The very first sentence with the "alien freaks" comment made it pretty clear that he had an agenda and a very obvious hatred for anyone that might believe in UFOs or aliens. So for that reason alone nothing he says can be believed.

Yes, some paragraphs would have been nice too.