I am listening to Jacques Vallee on c2c right now. Rich and Bryce are coming up after the next break. I do love Vallee and that is not to say that I agree with everything he says, but I do agree with the gist of it.
I have big girlie hair plans for today! Anyone interested in that type of girlie stuff can read about it at my girlie blog. :-)
I may add to this post or post something new later after I have listened to Rich and Bryce for a while.
2 comments:
Vallee was awesome. He always approaches the UFO phenomenon from a scientist's perspective, something many in Ufology find irritating all the while complaning about science ignoring the phenomenon. Well, when scientists do start taking UFOs seriously, this is very likely what it's going to be like.
I hope I can stay awake to listen to all the disclosure discussion, but I'm fading. Time to brew some dark roast.
He was certainly right about one thing: There is no simplistic one-stop shopping for a regard of this thing... that is _real_, with a _technology_, and for which we have no dictionary for communication, but remains as wholly existential as it is seemingly ephemeral.
This phenomena, extant, demands a regard for the exact same reason that an infant is required to leave the play-pen at some eventuality. Is science big enough to regard _that_?
This is what V is actually saying, imo, quite contrary to those who would car-jack his thinking to facilitate their own turgid denial, eh?
alienview@roadrunner.com
> www.AlienView.net
>> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
>>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com
Post a Comment