One wonders at the stunning level of mal-intellectual obstinacy employed by some! These second tier adherents to the regressive clan of Intelligence-Without-Imagination (IWI c/o Carlson/Hebert) employ such while a future—wholly open ended—stands revealed in seven categories of compelling evidence, evidence that some of the circumspect even call proof.
Yea and verily, friends and neighbors and forgetting the IWI and other entities in gravid mopery [g]. Though, Yes! Wholly unconsidered and even ignored by these IWI card carriers—dulled dopes duped to dreary insentience—apparently, by upper caste "morons and intellectual lightweights," is a massive evidentiary pathway known across seven categories to include:
(1) The Historical textual documents glyphed in soot and cut into stone or otherwise writ in ancient inks on chalky vellum.
(2) The Artistic Historical extant from primitives on the walls of their caves through middle-age wood-cuts to the masterpieces of the masters on rough canvas and slick gesso.
(3) The quality Anecdotal reports backed up by multiple vetted witnesses and corresponding radar.
(4) Genuine Photographic pieces prior to digital photography.
(5) Extant Physical Traces of landing UFOs as laboriously outlined by Ted Phillips and others.
(6) The wholly Personal evidence, if you have any as I do.
(7) Even the Mathematical as it is described in modern physics regarding the consequences of satisfying requirements for the formality of the actual occurrence of "things"... something corporeal condencing into actuality in this multiverse (humanity "happened" so others _must_) but, specifically, as it is described in _Probability One_ by Amir D. Aczel, PhD. Alien intelligence, reader, is a certainty! Moreover, the evidence is that they are _here._
See, Lesley, I just went through a laborious explication without ONCE mentioning Robert Hastings...
Still, it remains... Every bit of the preceding must come to _bupkis_ for these easily distracted IWI adherents to be correct about "pipe-dream UFOs, and the dolts, dim-wits, or dumb-asses following them." Every bit! Every item! Every shred!
Those are longs odds even for the IWI fundamentalist. Yet, they'll lay them, still!
Read a new _book_ boys! Your counter to re-read an old one is dismissed, denied, and disqualified. You had your chance. You blew it.
Unable to lead and incapable of following, you must now just get out of the way or be run down.
alienview@roadrunner.com > www.AlienView.net >> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/ >>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com
In reference to Robert Hastings and Robert Salas, they tend to say a lot of things, most of which can't stand up to careful examination. Both Salas and Hastings are well-confirmed liars and frauds, pure and simple. If you do the research yourself instead of taking their word for what happened during an event they were not present to witness, I'm certain you'll reach the same conclusion.
Hastings' discussions of Robert Salas' claims involving asserted experiences during the alleged UFO events at Echo Flight and Oscar Flight in March 1967 fail to take into account the widely known facts of Salas' very poor credibility and his numerous, proven lies to the public regarding this matter. There were no UFOs involved at Echo Flight at all, and the incident at Oscar Flight never even happened. The men who have spread these lies, primarily Robert Salas and Robert Hastings, have done so for their own benefit, and they have proven to be both dishonest and wrong on numerous occasions in numerous ways. Both men are proven liars who didn't merely get a few facts wrong; they invented them entirely, and they did so to take advantage other people's desires to believe. This is how they earn their paychecks.
The only thing people need to understand about sources of information like Robert Salas and Robert Hastings can be summed up pretty quickly: if you can't trust them to tell the truth, why would you listen to anything that they have to say? They invesnt issues, write about them, and sell them to people; they charge outrageous fees for their lectures, and they sell videotapes and DVDs discussing their inventions as if they were factual. There is no basis in fact, however -- the lies they've told are indisputable. And yet you are elevating them to a level of reasonable sources of validated information, and they are not.
I would recommend that if you are truly interested in understanding something about Robert Salas' or Robert Hastings' credibility, you go to the following URLs, where you can download at no cost a book and supporting articles discussing in some detail exactly how far they can be trusted:
These are free to anybody, and you'll never require an Amazon membership to learn a few of these facts. I would also recommend that you examine the numerous interviews and articles at the Reality Uncovered website: http://www.realityuncovered.net/ -- seven of the top eleven articles all discuss the events at Echo Flight and Oscar Flight in March 1967, and include interviews with both the commander and the deputy commander at Echo Flight on March 16, 1967.
Thank you, James Carlson jtcarl@yahoo.com Albuquerque, NM
4 comments:
One wonders at the stunning level of mal-intellectual obstinacy employed by some! These second tier adherents to the regressive clan of Intelligence-Without-Imagination (IWI c/o Carlson/Hebert) employ such while a future—wholly open ended—stands revealed in seven categories of compelling evidence, evidence that some of the circumspect even call proof.
Yea and verily, friends and neighbors and forgetting the IWI and other entities in gravid mopery [g]. Though, Yes! Wholly unconsidered and even ignored by these IWI card carriers—dulled dopes duped to dreary insentience—apparently, by upper caste "morons and intellectual lightweights," is a massive evidentiary pathway known across seven categories to include:
(1) The Historical textual documents glyphed in soot and cut into stone or otherwise writ in ancient inks on chalky vellum.
(2) The Artistic Historical extant from primitives on the walls of their caves through middle-age wood-cuts to the masterpieces of the masters on rough canvas and slick gesso.
(3) The quality Anecdotal reports backed up by multiple vetted witnesses and corresponding radar.
(4) Genuine Photographic pieces prior to digital photography.
(5) Extant Physical Traces of landing UFOs as laboriously outlined by Ted Phillips and others.
(6) The wholly Personal evidence, if you have any as I do.
(7) Even the Mathematical as it is described in modern physics regarding the consequences of satisfying requirements for the formality of the actual occurrence of "things"... something corporeal condencing into actuality in this multiverse (humanity "happened" so others _must_) but, specifically, as it is described in _Probability One_ by Amir D. Aczel, PhD. Alien intelligence, reader, is a certainty! Moreover, the evidence is that they are _here._
See, Lesley, I just went through a laborious explication without ONCE mentioning Robert Hastings...
Still, it remains... Every bit of the preceding must come to _bupkis_ for these easily distracted IWI adherents to be correct about "pipe-dream UFOs, and the dolts, dim-wits, or dumb-asses following them." Every bit! Every item! Every shred!
Those are longs odds even for the IWI fundamentalist. Yet, they'll lay them, still!
Read a new _book_ boys! Your counter to re-read an old one is dismissed, denied, and disqualified. You had your chance. You blew it.
Unable to lead and incapable of following, you must now just get out of the way or be run down.
alienview@roadrunner.com
> www.AlienView.net
>> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
>>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com
In reference to Robert Hastings and Robert Salas, they tend to say a lot of things, most of which can't stand up to careful examination. Both Salas and Hastings are well-confirmed liars and frauds, pure and simple. If you do the research yourself instead of taking their word for what happened during an event they were not present to witness, I'm certain you'll reach the same conclusion.
Hastings' discussions of Robert Salas' claims involving asserted experiences during the alleged UFO events at Echo Flight and Oscar Flight in March 1967 fail to take into account the widely known facts of Salas' very poor credibility and his numerous, proven lies to the public regarding this matter. There were no UFOs involved at Echo Flight at all, and the incident at Oscar Flight never even happened. The men who have spread these lies, primarily Robert Salas and Robert Hastings, have done so for their own benefit, and they have proven to be both dishonest and wrong on numerous occasions in numerous ways. Both men are proven liars who didn't merely get a few facts wrong; they invented them entirely, and they did so to take advantage other people's desires to believe. This is how they earn their paychecks.
The only thing people need to understand about sources of information like Robert Salas and Robert Hastings can be summed up pretty quickly: if you can't trust them to tell the truth, why would you listen to anything that they have to say? They invesnt issues, write about them, and sell them to people; they charge outrageous fees for their lectures, and they sell videotapes and DVDs discussing their inventions as if they were factual. There is no basis in fact, however -- the lies they've told are indisputable. And yet you are elevating them to a level of reasonable sources of validated information, and they are not.
I would recommend that if you are truly interested in understanding something about Robert Salas' or Robert Hastings' credibility, you go to the following URLs, where you can download at no cost a book and supporting articles discussing in some detail exactly how far they can be trusted:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26641522/Americans-Credulous-by-James-Carlson
http://www.scribd.com/doc/42303580/Echo-Flights-of-Fantasy-Anatomy-of-a-UFO-Hoax-by-James-Carlson
http://www.scribd.com/doc/49495918/The-Bunny-s-Retort-by-James-Carlson
These are free to anybody, and you'll never require an Amazon membership to learn a few of these facts. I would also recommend that you examine the numerous interviews and articles at the Reality Uncovered website: http://www.realityuncovered.net/ -- seven of the top eleven articles all discuss the events at Echo Flight and Oscar Flight in March 1967, and include interviews with both the commander and the deputy commander at Echo Flight on March 16, 1967.
Thank you,
James Carlson
jtcarl@yahoo.com
Albuquerque, NM
IMO...A blithered blather of incoherently concocted denial-ism, prosecuted fear, bald cant, inordinate bias, imagination lacking reductionism, and faux-intellectual cowardice. Posted.
Oops, I forgot to mention: wholly insulting to the intelligence of reader with ears to hear and eyes to see, eh?
Post a Comment