So let's see, Lance Moody is anonymous, and the actual letters demonstrating that Imbrogno's credentials are false don't exist. Talk about living in denial.
A podcast indeed!
Oh, Gene is offended that Nancy thinks he has a podcast! No, not a podcast, a real radio like thingie with zillions of ads for your listening enjoyment! BTW, Nancy never said Lance was anonymous, she was just wondering. She certainly NEVER said that such documents were false or didn't exist.
Worse, if Nancy Birnes spent a few minutes listening to The Paracast and checking these boards, she'd know full well what was going on, and that Lance Moody is the online name for — Lance Moody. Some of us do use our real names around here.
Once again, Gene is offended that Nancy doesn't listen to his show or read his forum. Poor baby! I know he thinks it is "the gold standard," but very few others do... Well, unless by that he means selling gold on his show and if so - he is the gold standard! Right up there with Alex Jones and George Noory!
Wait a sec...
Is paracast the source that broke this story? No! In fact, Lance Moody, whom they pretend to have so much love for, seems to be totally banned from their forum and actually posted all of this on his own blog! Gene Steinberg - way to take credit for something that totally had nothing to do with you and/or your show, other than being mentioned on your show and forum! High five!
Hey, I have mentioned it here at the blog several times! Now I can take credit for breaking the story! Oh, and UFO Magazine blog mentioned it too - credit!
6 comments:
Your post demonstrates how off topic the whole dynamic is. The subject of this three ring circus has been lost and apparently no one noticed this, Researchers researching other researchers who research the military who research the private researchers that research lead each other by the nose. No one seems to have a ironic bone in their bodies.
Bruce, I think it's clear some of us do recognize that...
My apologies if you inferred a personal reference as in "some of us". I think though you would agree the vast majority do not realize they have become self parodying, as the same behavior rotates like a drum in a washing machine. None of this has anything to do with theoretical considerations except perhaps who is the bigger egotist.I have my theories but I don't think they are worth discussing. It just creates more of the same crap.
Pardon the analogy, Mr. Duensing, it is accurate even if objectionable, but, sometimes alligators have to be killed to drain a swamp. Your admonitions to shoot for higher plateaus are empty when dealing with death-rolling crocodiles attached to sundry extremities.
Alfred
I don't think there is any justice to be had in this constant squabbling. It reminds me of a lost expedition whose relations have become so strained they lose sight of their aim, or the aim becomes so obtuse, personally vested and territorial no progress can be made up the mountain.The mountain becomes secondary. Maybe I am just tired of contentious and heated decades of he said, she said or variations of the same. It becomes like a drone, a constant static to be navigated, or bypassed. You may be right, I am just perhaps too old and too tired to give a damn about who thinks they are right and who thinks they are wrong.I simply think most of this contention is dysfunctional, and a distraction. Sigh.
Post a Comment