Divided we fall.
It wasn't until yesterday that I realized that there were groups of people determined to divide the 9-11 truth movement into factions fighting each other rather than the true enemy. I suppose I should have expected such since I know it is impossible for humans to get along, especially when they are fighting for the same audience.
You would think that groups interested in getting the truth about 9-11 out would concentrate on that effort. You would think being busy with that effort would kept them from having time to produce smear pages such as this - http://www.wingtv.net/shame.html.
We all may disagree with various points people make in the 9/11 movement, but disagreeing is quite a bit different than bashing or smearing.
They apparently find Alex Jones worthy of the most smearing. Why I cannot imagine because if not for Alex Jones many people such as myself may have never even heard enough about the 9-11 conspiracy to give it much thought. I certainly had never heard of wingtv until yesterday so obviously they are nowhere near as good as Alex at getting information to the masses. While they have a ton of articles bashing Jones, doing an internet search didn't yield one article from Jones even responding. Good for him! They probably just want the attention to draw visitors to their website.
Some other people bashed on their site include - Jeff Rense, Greg Szymanski, Art Bell, Bill O'Reilly and Michael Ruppert. While it is easy for just about anyone to agree with O'Reilly bashing, why waste time on him? You can find that kind of crap all over the internet, a 9-11 truth site should be concerned with that topic and not busy bashing others especially others involved in the same movement.
Jeff Rense actually took time to respond to their attacks, why is beyond me. Apparently that is what these people do, they attack and then they hope to get mentioned on the "popular sites" by people trying to defend themselves.
In my opinion, sites like wingtv and other sites who have pages devoted to bashing others in their movement do nothing to help their cause, nor do I consider them members of any movement or cause other than their own. They play right into the government plan of divide and conquer. I am sure the illuminati just love sites like that! At the very least it confuses people as to who they can trust and such venom towards people in their own movement probably completely scares people away from it.
Normally I wouldn't take time to even comment on such as this, but if there is one thing that really irritates me it is people who try to make themselves look good or important by making others look bad or wrong. It is a deplorable human trait that needs to be abolished.
3 comments:
I hadn't noticed your pyramid pic til now.. here's a link to your 6/6/06/ captstone that might fit your mood..
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index913.htm
I've come across a lot of backbiting and infighting with all the hot topics - 9/11, UFOs, zionism. While there may be prosaic reasons for the disagreements like attention getting and $$, I think there's a far worse cause for the squabbles. There are paid disinfo cretins and agents who are trying to muddy the waters and sow confusion.
My gut reaction tells me that the ones who point fingers and label others as the agents provocateur are the fakes themselves.
The neocon projection thingie and all.
Jon - I have no problem if they were just disagreeing with what others consider evidence of 9-11. They don't do that though, they wage personal attacks on people.
Nolo - I pretty much agree with that.
Post a Comment