All Reynolds does is blog a personal opinion column, nothing more. He occasionally has guests do columns, but his blog is mostly personal bombast. He seems to fancy himself a sort of Robert Novack-type commentator. I stopped visiting his blog because he keeps repeating himself and says nothing of interest anyway.
Ma'am -- you under-sell, under-estimate, and under-appreciate the gravid sociopathy of RR and his murder of real or imagined crows. I submit you might feel differently if you were the person, RR suggested to the community, that might be having sex with children.
I thought it was humorous in the sense that it reminded me of sitting in some mandatory conference and someone says out loud. P.U..this stinks. I think a little leavening in not taking this too seriously and not giving it more gravitas than it deserves, puts it more in perspective.
A presumed failure on _my_ part, Sir, but I'm finding I can make no sense from what you have written, be that as it may sorry about the bad smell... that's albatross.
It's simple. Reynolds said UFO Updates stinks, which flies in the face of a social and decidedly political sort of self legislated expertise, all of which reminds me of business conferences. None of us are experts, we are all more akin to commentators. Sometimes we take ourselves too seriously, which was Reynolds point, at least that was my take. Both you and Reynolds write jeremiads about a variety of personal dislikes, which then, both of you proceed to write them about each other. At the same time, both of you are in a public forum, both of you take Ufology seriously. I don't know what albatross you are referring to but none of us really know the nature of the UFO phenomenon, and we are all an albatross to some extent, in relation to what we don't know versus what we do. I read your Alien View as well as Iconoclast, and so perhaps you can both be irreverent, and that's fine. Both of you say this or that stinks. So do I. I think from an outsider perspective all of this is a tempest in a teapot.
I resent every portion of your insulting "comparison," such that it is, based as it seems to be on _complete_ insentience.
You know what? I think your indifference 'stinks.' I think your judgment 'stinks.' I think your ambivalence 'stinks'! I think your gain-said acceptance of Rich Reynolds demonstrated willingness to control others by coercions of libel and slander, stinks. Now there's a pile of fish! Breathe deeply!
A tempest in a teapot sure, Mr. Duensing, until it's _your_ teapot and it's suggested —in that "public" arena that you identify— that you may be having sex with children in it.
That's "sex with children," Mr. Duensing; what part of "sex with children" a clear slander _per se_, do you not understand and give a complete by?
Say it's you, eh? You provide for a granddaughter who grows up to see something dodgy on the INTERNET about grandpa...
No, instead she will read, to the embarrassment of one and all I assure you, where I drive a literary stake through the heart of my "accuser" for the affront! In a less enlightened time I'd be hacking him to pieces with a saber!
There are four generations of my name, Mr. Duensing. We've kept a certain pride with regard to right behavior, honor, and reputation in those four generations.
I won't have it smeared by the likes of Rich Reynolds, his enablers, supporters, or erstwhile friends.
Perhaps you can take such lightly, Mr. Duensing; I shall not.
Whatever. You might want to consider removing those racist coolie images from your site before becoming huffy about honor and so forth. I have no horse in this race and that perturbs you. Be perturbed, so now you are attacking me from saying lighten up? Well, Al, lighten up, I dont think you had sex with children and if you did or did not is your affair not mine. You want to divide people into camps? No thanks. I enjoy both your sites and theres not a damn thing you can do about it so get off the soapbox, it's old news and aside from you no one is bringing this up but you and Rich..so get over it, man. Move on, for heaven's sake.
Well -- we have you at your measure, now, don't we. Not a question.
"Whatever?" You're an adolescent female? Ya gonna tell me to "talk to the hand" next? Let me head you off. Talk to the finger.
"Racist coolie images"? My. My. The knee-walking and constipated PC person offended has the problem, Mr D., not the parson respectful about a cartoonist 70 years in the past who was only trying to dispense a little tried and true Chinese wisdom to his fellows every day. Traditional garb is only ever a traditional garb, Mr. D., reactionary boneheads and reflexive mouth-breathers, not unlike yourself apparently, can insist it's something else.
Racist?! Where has your outrage been thus far? I've been restoring them for a decade! Sir, you ape the too conveniently clueless moronic.
Racist?! No, really! Where has your outrage been thus far? As I pointed out I've been restoring them for a decade! Where was you outrage prior to our kafuffle here?
Silent!
A hypocrite by any other name and smelling as sweet. Indirectly, Rich Reynolds can turn you into a hypocrite. What else will he do for you?
You write: "I dont think you had sex with children and if you did or did not is your affair not mine."
No "affair" of yours... Do I get that right? How do you feel about "rape" and "murder." Are you equally egalitarian about those?
Is this how you would be seen in our community?
Additionally, if indirectly, Rich Reynolds puts your very character in question. What else will he do for you?
Let's see... So far Reynolds provides that you be made over into a hypocrite with questionable personal character unable to determine right and wrong, and ambivalent to same. Does that about cover it, so far?
Perhaps I was sugar-coating you with the appellation "moron..."
No offense taken. As a moron and as you put it a insentient dumb knee walking idiot,I enjoyed your "Jeremiad — a prolonged lamentation or complaint; also: a cautionary or angry harangue..." which seems to be a excellent description. I think it's funny and sad.
As you said,
"Doubt what is doubtable. Believe what is believable. Think what you will."
I did
"...I know not what course others may take; mine changes regardless..."
Mine just did. Good luck and Best Wishes. I will avoid further upsetting you.
I don't know how that can be when all this comes as a result of my rufusing to "chill out" regarding the wanton and needless RAPE of my character and personal reputation.
This rape occurred as a result of my reasonable criticism regarding the methods, motivations, and mechanisms of so-called media group RRR... Rich Reynolds in actuality.
Give up on me just rolling over. There's no statute of limitations on my outrage!
I'll have cash damages and profuse apology before I'm through for serial slander per se. Look it up.
I did not say you were bullying. I was not defending Rich and I don't defend you, when I said it's none of my affair, I meant that is between you and Rich, not me. I was just trying to comment on Rich on "UFO Updates Stinks". Although I do think you should reconsider those images, but if not, fine. Again, that's your business. I was simply conveying how I see them. I think you should be careful what you say in print like making threats. Lets just leave this to your inferred court date, I have really no horse in this race, and I have seven grandchildren of my own. Just leave me out of this please. Thanks
Hey look... Done and done, ok sweetheart? You're left out! It might be helpful for you to quit responding in the thread... but that's not even advice. I wouldn't presume to tell _you_ what to do!
Enough is enough. You are a pompous gasbag with an ego to match your lack of civility, and your self legislated right to spew venom just shows you for what you are, an overinflated crank with a handjob for a brain. Can you understand this? You are a loose cannon and a dick. Get some psychological assistance.
Awwww... what happened to your pathetic veneer of wounded sensibility, one, and two, aren't you light in the drawers to be commenting on my need for "psychological assistance"?
Gasbag? At least I have gas _and_ a bag, eh?
"Crank with a hand-job brain" was inspired, though. And yes, provoked by double standards, utter senselessness, and a false bottomed veneer of any type, I can be a dick. The cluelessly disingenuous bring that out in me.
Seems like fatuous insult and base name-calling is all you have. Can you understand _this_? Get some gator-aide.
Your base name calling began this, and enough is enough. You accuse Rich of this and proceed to do it to me when attempting to be reasonable. Read your own comments, you short sighted moron. What you call a veneer of civility was appealing to a congenital crank who was once again, was being a loose cannon and a boorish prig with lots of pride. I have more than name calling as you have applied it to garner this response, which is exactly what the kind of constipated mindset, Sir, that you place on the public record for all to enjoy in all your slavish glory like a 12 year old prepubescent who is light in the pants lacking any gravitas except the effluent pouring from your inverted eyesight that is so self absorbed, it leaks sewage.
Poor Ritchy, eh? The real victim in all of this. Tsk...
You confuse name-calling with assessment, Mr. Duensing, but I'm relieved you can come-out, finally, and be all you can be, although "like a 12 year old prepubescent who is light in the pants lacking any gravitas except the effluent pouring from your inverted eyesight that is so self absorbed, it leaks sewage..." seems a little abstruse, even for you.
That said... poor Ritchy. No, really. He should come over and say something on your behalf. Maybe he will, eh?
The only reason to confuse name calling with assessment, is to mirror you own emotional immaturity that flowers like a weed in the light of being challenged with a taste of your own prescription. This has nothing to with Rich you idiot.Whats the matter Sir Gasbag, can't take what you dish out and then as a true poseur, you bring Rich into this when its directed at me? Really? Your disingeniousness is showing Sir Alfred. So you are berating me to get to Rich? I have no need of him to take on a flatulent dick inflated with hypocritical self righteousness, that you apply like a sour attitude that betrays your carefully wrought sense of justice that you dispense like a true vigilante. This is between you and I you dumb moron.Cranks such as yourself are a dime a dozen.
"This is between you and I you dumb moron.Cranks such as yourself are a dime a dozen."
....Thaaaaat's not quite hanging together very well, is it? Besides, it's fifteen cents.
Wow, between _us_! What a concept, though who's feeling a little "filled with themselves," now, eh?
I suppose it _is_ about "us," in as much as I won't countenance an apologist for the likes of Rich Reynolds, a person of questionable aspect, who, when he's waxing not so eloquently about the ambivalent sexuality of Jesus Christ, is reporting to employers and opponents alike that I may be having sex with children.
Gawd but I get tired of saying that... and why do I _have_ to keep saying that... but that I won't stand still for rape... or roll over quietly for these self-same supporters, apologists, enablers, or facilitators—not unlike yourself— does that get passed your fog, cool beard, and hurt pouties, Mr. D.?
Really sorry Rich has to get caught up in this... "more real" contention between "us"; your bombastic accommodation of a toxic slanderer can of course have little bearing on my disgust with you, forgetting how astonished I am that you can be so unaware how Reynolds' egregious line-crossing has —surprise— made you over into a disingenuous hypocrite who apparently can't tell right from wrong and is ambivalent in that hypocrisy's regard. Sincerely astonishing. Has he worked some kind of ... dark magic... on you? Voodoo dolls... Cash?
Ironically, I submit that were it you, Sir, you would be outraged in extrimis!
What sane person would not be outraged? Maybe some of these won't do anything about it, satisfied to slink away quietly in hopes that it all goes away... I mean you were probably asking for it... dressed too provocatively in a your smart skirt and heeled shoes...
I'm not one of those.
Poor Rich, eh? ...And who were you again, oh that's right, the guy who _was_ mocking me all along.
Doesn't it feel good to just come out and be yourself!?
23 comments:
All Reynolds does is blog a personal opinion column, nothing more. He occasionally has guests do columns, but his blog is mostly personal bombast. He seems to fancy himself a sort of Robert Novack-type commentator. I stopped visiting his blog because he keeps repeating himself and says nothing of interest anyway.
Ma'am -- you under-sell, under-estimate, and under-appreciate the gravid sociopathy of RR and his murder of real or imagined crows. I submit you might feel differently if you were the person, RR suggested to the community, that might be having sex with children.
I thought it was humorous in the sense that it reminded me of sitting in some mandatory conference and someone says out loud. P.U..this stinks. I think a little leavening in not taking this too seriously and not giving it more gravitas than it deserves, puts it more in perspective.
A presumed failure on _my_ part, Sir, but I'm finding I can make no sense from what you have written, be that as it may sorry about the bad smell... that's albatross.
It's simple. Reynolds said UFO Updates stinks, which flies in the face of a social and decidedly political sort of self legislated expertise, all of which reminds me of business conferences. None of us are experts, we are all more akin to commentators. Sometimes we take ourselves too seriously, which was Reynolds point, at least that was my take. Both you and Reynolds write jeremiads about a variety of personal dislikes, which then, both of you proceed to write them about each other. At the same time, both of you are in a public forum, both of you take Ufology seriously. I don't know what albatross you are referring to but none of us really know the nature of the UFO phenomenon, and we are all an albatross to some extent, in relation to what we don't know versus what we do.
I read your Alien View as well as Iconoclast, and so perhaps you can both be irreverent, and that's fine. Both of you say this or that stinks. So do I. I think from an outsider perspective all of this is a tempest in a teapot.
You are impossible, Sir!
I resent every portion of your insulting "comparison," such that it is, based as it seems to be on _complete_ insentience.
You know what? I think your indifference 'stinks.' I think your judgment 'stinks.' I think your ambivalence 'stinks'! I think your gain-said acceptance of Rich Reynolds demonstrated willingness to control others by coercions of libel and slander, stinks. Now there's a pile of fish! Breathe deeply!
A tempest in a teapot sure, Mr. Duensing, until it's _your_ teapot and it's suggested —in that "public" arena that you identify— that you may be having sex with children in it.
That's "sex with children," Mr. Duensing; what part of "sex with children" a clear slander _per se_, do you not understand and give a complete by?
Say it's you, eh? You provide for a granddaughter who grows up to see something dodgy on the INTERNET about grandpa...
No, instead she will read, to the embarrassment of one and all I assure you, where I drive a literary stake through the heart of my "accuser" for the affront! In a less enlightened time I'd be hacking him to pieces with a saber!
There are four generations of my name, Mr. Duensing. We've kept a certain pride with regard to right behavior, honor, and reputation in those four generations.
I won't have it smeared by the likes of Rich Reynolds, his enablers, supporters, or erstwhile friends.
Perhaps you can take such lightly, Mr. Duensing; I shall not.
Posted.
Whatever. You might want to consider removing those racist coolie images from your site before becoming huffy about honor and so forth. I have no horse in this race and that perturbs you. Be perturbed, so now you are attacking me from saying lighten up?
Well, Al, lighten up, I dont think you had sex with children and if you did or did not is your affair not mine. You want to divide people into camps? No thanks. I enjoy both your sites and theres not a damn thing you can do about it so get off the soapbox, it's old news and aside from you no one is bringing this up but you and Rich..so get over it, man. Move on, for heaven's sake.
Well -- we have you at your measure, now, don't we. Not a question.
"Whatever?" You're an adolescent female? Ya gonna tell me to "talk to the hand" next? Let me head you off. Talk to the finger.
"Racist coolie images"? My. My. The knee-walking and constipated PC person offended has the problem, Mr D., not the parson respectful about a cartoonist 70 years in the past who was only trying to dispense a little tried and true Chinese wisdom to his fellows every day. Traditional garb is only ever a traditional garb, Mr. D., reactionary boneheads and reflexive mouth-breathers, not unlike yourself apparently, can insist it's something else.
Racist?! Where has your outrage been thus far? I've been restoring them for a decade! Sir, you ape the too conveniently clueless moronic.
You want huffy? I can show you huffy.
No, "Ape" my shiny metal ass, you _are_ a moron.
Racist?! No, really! Where has your outrage been thus far? As I pointed out I've been restoring them for a decade! Where was you outrage prior to our kafuffle here?
Silent!
A hypocrite by any other name and smelling as sweet. Indirectly, Rich Reynolds can turn you into a hypocrite. What else will he do for you?
No apologies, but I have to ask about this, too.
You write: "I dont think you had sex with children and if you did or did not is your affair not mine."
No "affair" of yours... Do I get that right? How do you feel about "rape" and "murder." Are you equally egalitarian about those?
Is this how you would be seen in our community?
Additionally, if indirectly, Rich Reynolds puts your very character in question. What else will he do for you?
Let's see... So far Reynolds provides that you be made over into a hypocrite with questionable personal character unable to determine right and wrong, and ambivalent to same. Does that about cover it, so far?
Perhaps I was sugar-coating you with the appellation "moron..."
No offense taken. As a moron and as you put it a insentient dumb knee walking idiot,I enjoyed your
"Jeremiad — a prolonged lamentation or complaint; also: a cautionary or angry harangue..." which seems to be a excellent description. I think it's funny and sad.
As you said,
"Doubt what is doubtable. Believe what is believable. Think what you will."
I did
"...I know not what course others may take; mine changes regardless..."
Mine just did. Good luck and Best Wishes. I will avoid further upsetting you.
...with my ready thanks!
I'm called a "bully..."
I don't know how that can be when all this comes as a result of my rufusing to "chill out" regarding the wanton and needless RAPE of my character and personal reputation.
This rape occurred as a result of my reasonable criticism regarding the methods, motivations, and mechanisms of so-called media group RRR... Rich Reynolds in actuality.
Give up on me just rolling over. There's no statute of limitations on my outrage!
I'll have cash damages and profuse apology before I'm through for serial slander per se. Look it up.
Rich raped the wrong guy.
I did not say you were bullying. I was not defending Rich and I don't defend you, when I said it's none of my affair, I meant that is between you and Rich, not me. I was just trying to comment on Rich on "UFO Updates Stinks". Although I do think you should reconsider those images, but if not, fine. Again, that's your business. I was simply conveying how I see them. I think you should be careful what you say in print like making threats. Lets just leave this to your inferred court date, I have really no horse in this race, and I have seven grandchildren of my own. Just leave me out of this please.
Thanks
I never said you... ...oh never mind.
What threats? Again, never mind!
You substantiate bupkis!
Hey look... Done and done, ok sweetheart? You're left out! It might be helpful for you to quit responding in the thread... but that's not even advice. I wouldn't presume to tell _you_ what to do!
Enough is enough. You are a pompous gasbag with an ego to match your lack of civility, and your self legislated right to spew venom just shows you for what you are, an overinflated crank with a handjob for a brain. Can you understand this? You are a loose cannon and a dick. Get some psychological assistance.
Awwww... what happened to your pathetic veneer of wounded sensibility, one, and two, aren't you light in the drawers to be commenting on my need for "psychological assistance"?
Gasbag? At least I have gas _and_ a bag, eh?
"Crank with a hand-job brain" was inspired, though. And yes, provoked by double standards, utter senselessness, and a false bottomed veneer of any type, I can be a dick. The cluelessly disingenuous bring that out in me.
Seems like fatuous insult and base name-calling is all you have. Can you understand _this_? Get some gator-aide.
So glad to have found out about _you_! Really.
Your base name calling began this, and enough is enough. You accuse Rich of this and proceed to do it to me when attempting to be reasonable. Read your own comments, you short sighted moron. What you call a veneer of civility was appealing to a congenital crank who was once again, was being a loose cannon and a boorish prig with lots of pride. I have more than name calling as you have applied it to garner this response, which is exactly what the kind of constipated mindset, Sir, that you place on the public record for all to enjoy in all your slavish glory like a 12 year old prepubescent who is light in the pants lacking any gravitas except the effluent pouring from your inverted eyesight that is so self absorbed, it leaks sewage.
Poor Ritchy, eh? The real victim in all of this. Tsk...
You confuse name-calling with assessment, Mr. Duensing, but I'm relieved you can come-out, finally, and be all you can be, although "like a 12 year old prepubescent who is light in the pants lacking any gravitas except the effluent pouring from your inverted eyesight that is so self absorbed, it leaks sewage..." seems a little abstruse, even for you.
That said... poor Ritchy. No, really. He should come over and say something on your behalf. Maybe he will, eh?
The only reason to confuse name calling with assessment, is to mirror you own emotional immaturity that flowers like a weed in the light of being challenged with a taste of your own prescription. This has nothing to with Rich you idiot.Whats the matter Sir Gasbag, can't take what you dish out and then as a true poseur, you bring Rich into this when its directed at me? Really? Your disingeniousness is showing Sir Alfred. So you are berating me to get to Rich? I have no need of him to take on a flatulent dick inflated with hypocritical self righteousness, that you apply like a sour attitude that betrays your carefully wrought sense of justice that you dispense like a true vigilante. This is between you and I you dumb moron.Cranks such as yourself are a dime a dozen.
Way more than enough. If you guys wish to continue this do it in private email or somewhere else. Thanks!
"This is between you and I you dumb moron.Cranks such as yourself are a dime a dozen."
....Thaaaaat's not quite hanging together very well, is it? Besides, it's fifteen cents.
Wow, between _us_! What a concept, though who's feeling a little "filled with themselves," now, eh?
I suppose it _is_ about "us," in as much as I won't countenance an apologist for the likes of Rich Reynolds, a person of questionable aspect, who, when he's waxing not so eloquently about the ambivalent sexuality of Jesus Christ, is reporting to employers and opponents alike that I may be having sex with children.
Gawd but I get tired of saying that... and why do I _have_ to keep saying that... but that I won't stand still for rape... or roll over quietly for these self-same supporters, apologists, enablers, or facilitators—not unlike yourself— does that get passed your fog, cool beard, and hurt pouties, Mr. D.?
Really sorry Rich has to get caught up in this... "more real" contention between "us"; your bombastic accommodation of a toxic slanderer can of course have little bearing on my disgust with you, forgetting how astonished I am that you can be so unaware how Reynolds' egregious line-crossing has —surprise— made you over into a disingenuous hypocrite who apparently can't tell right from wrong and is ambivalent in that hypocrisy's regard. Sincerely astonishing. Has he worked some kind of ... dark magic... on you? Voodoo dolls... Cash?
Ironically, I submit that were it you, Sir, you would be outraged in extrimis!
What sane person would not be outraged? Maybe some of these won't do anything about it, satisfied to slink away quietly in hopes that it all goes away... I mean you were probably asking for it... dressed too provocatively in a your smart skirt and heeled shoes...
I'm not one of those.
Poor Rich, eh? ...And who were you again, oh that's right, the guy who _was_ mocking me all along.
Doesn't it feel good to just come out and be yourself!?
Roger that... I'm done...
Post a Comment